Visitors

Add to Technorati Favorites
 
Spiritual Helps
Christian Blogroll
Family Friendly Blogroll

Buttons
Christian Blog Topsites Weblog Directory << ? Christian Bloggers # >> Blogarama - The Blog Directory Web Blog Pinging Service Blog Flux Directory Romow Web Directory Insane Blog Directory My Zimbio All-Blogs.net directory CafeChrist Top 100 My Zimbio
Top Stories
Other Things
EVOLUTION: Why Christians MUST Reject It
Friday, September 24, 2010
  
It has become very popular in some Christian circles today to argue that science has trumped the creation account, and that now we must fit God's Word into the "proofs" of science, rather than the other way around. 


Let me tell you why, as believers in the salvation of Jesus Christ, we must reject that completely .


1.  First,  if we are to suggest that man simply evolved out of the dust of the ground, we are striking at the the very heart of Scripture and its entire teaching about sin and salvation.  To put it bluntly, we are offering a REVOLUTION IN THEOLOGY, one in which our view of sin and salvation must be radically overhauled!


2.  Second, a theory of evolution and/or Evolutionary Creation must insist that we deny the truth about sin and death found in Romans 8:20-22.  This passage teaches that the "groaning and travailing of creation" was due to it's subjection to corruption by man's sin.  Evolution, on the other hand, insists that the elements of our universe spent billions of years "groaning and travailing" as it naturally sifted out the best from the worst.  This means that there would have been eons of animal strife, fear, pain, and death, not as a result of sin and God's curse upon the earth, but as a result of the universe painfully pounding out the results that we see on the planet today.  This then denies the Bible's teaching that death came to our world because of man's sin.  Evolution insists that death is nothing more than an inevitable part of the natural selection process.  


3.  Third, if evolution is true then man has not "fallen", he has actually "risen". He is the most splendid specimen of the evolutionary process. He is greater now than he ever was before.  This, of course, means that he is not uniquely created in the image of God; rather, he is nothing more than an elevated level of life and beast -- much more in "the image" of apes and hominids than an unseeable God. Sin, then, becomes a mere "disorder" which the evolutionary process will continue to refine and correct.  There is no need for moral judgment against man's imperfections....he isn't "fallen", he is simply not fully evolved.  Furthermore, the "wages of sin" (which is death) isn't the wages of sin at all; death is simply a part of the natural selection process. So for these reasons, in this system of thought, Christ's sacrifice for sin and victory over death isn't really necessary.  Death isn't the consequence of sin, it is simply a part of the evolutionary process.


And so we see that to adopt evolution as a Christian is to downgrade the atonement, if not totally eliminate it altogether. Man is no longer a sinner in need of a Savior, he is simply a result of colliding matter and chance.  Christ has not risen -- man has!  Jesus has no reason to rise from the dead, because death has nothing to do with sin. Man has not fallen, he has actually "risen" as the strongest and smartest of beings to emerge from that eons-old primordial soup. 


No, my friends, Christians MUST REJECT EVOLUTION in every form.  It is a sick and toxic marriage to wed evolution with God's creative hand.  We don't need the Theory (and I stress "theory") of Evolution to explain what science observes.  God is completely capable of creating a fully mature universe with all the scientific principles that we see in play today.  The only reason that any one needs to posit a theory of evolution is because he/she denies the truths above, and wishes to eliminate God from the scientific process.  Then one is forced to rewind the tape, bypassing God's declared creation, all the way back to what appears to them to be the beginning of time.  Unwilling to accept that God can create a fully developed universe instantly, they seek a different beginning.

But if we are willing to accept God as a starting point for creation, we can also accept that He has the power to create an already mature universe in six days, and believe that His account of creation in Genesis is correct. 


Don't be bewitched and "taken captive by empty philosophy , the traditions of men, and the elementary principles of this world."(Colossians 2:8)  Evolution insists that sin does not exist, and that death is not a result of sin --it is a selective process that existed long before man was ever made, which of course make's Christ's sacrifice at the cross completely worthless, untrue, and unnecessary.  


No, my friends, if The Gospel is true then EVOLUTION MUST BE FALSE, AND HAS NO PLACE WHATSOEVER IN THE CREATION ACCOUNT!






Labels:

posted by Alan Harstone @ 4:26 PM  
2 Comments:
  • At Wednesday, October 20, 2010, Blogger Steve Finnell said…

    Very good post. (you are invited to follow my blog)

     
  • At Thursday, December 09, 2010, Blogger caheidelberger said…

    [Thanks for the Bonhoeffer comment!]

    On point #3 above: you commit a common misinterpretation of evolution. Evolution is not synonomous with progress. Evolution is not an inevitable progression toward superior life forms. Evolution favors what works, what survives in given environments. Our vision and claws could be sharper, our skin better insulated (chimps have us beat for natural warmth), our metabolism less inclined to crave sugar and turn it to fat. Evolution offers no evidence that we are its "most splendid specimen." Dinosaurs might have thought the same thing about themselves for a couple hundred million years (had their brains been bigger... but who needs brains when you have 12-inch teeth?). We just happen to be a species that is well suited to survive in the current environment. Our descent (interesting word) from apes is not proof of superiority to apes, any more than Peyton Manning's descent from Archie Manning proves Peyton is the better quarterback.

     
Post a Comment
<< Home
 
About Me

Name: Alan Harstone
Home: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
About Me: Senior Pastor Saskatoon Evangelical Free Church
See my complete profile
Previous Post
Archives
Sites I Recommend
Books I'm Reading
Powered by

Free Blogger Templates

BLOGGER

© 2005 Discovering The Heart Of God Template by Isnaini Dot Com