|
| Risky Ethics |
| Friday, May 25, 2007 |
God has been blessing the socks off of me this past week as I've been reading through Mark Buchanan's book Your God Is Too Safe (Multnomah Books). Let me share another clip of it with you. I hope it stirs you:
A number of years ago a wise man pointed out to me the root difference between the ethic of Jesus and the ethic of the Pharisees. Usually we think of the difference in these terms: the Pharisees had an ethic of externals, of ritual and rigmarole, and Jesus had an ethic of the heart, of the heart's inner workings. The Pharisees were concerned about not committing adultery, while Jesus was concerned about about lust, the root of adultery. He was concerned with adulterousness.
That's true as far as it goes, only it doesn't go very far. The deeper difference between Jesus ethic and that of the Pharisees was this: the Pharisees had an ethic of avoidance, and Jesus had an ethic of involvement. The Pharisees question was not "How can I glorify God?" It was "How can I avoid bringing disgrace to God?" This degenerated into a concern not with God, but with self -- with image, reputation, procedure. They didn't ask "How can I make others clean?" They asked, "How can I keep myself from getting dirty?" They didn't seek to rescue sinners, only to avoid sinning (and sinners alike).
Jesus in sharp contrast, got involved. He sought always and in all ways to help, to heal, to save, to restore. Rather than running from evil, He ran to toward good. And Jesus got close enough to unholy people for the spark of holiness in Him to jump. He took the tax collectors, the rough fisherman, the harlots, the demon possessed, and gave back to them dignity and life. The Pharisees avoided these people lest they were infected with their sin and overwhelmed by their evil.
The tragedy is that we have often preferred the ethic of the Pharisees to the ethic of Christ. We have become self-obsessed in our doctrine of sin, as though sin were merely a personal flaw like acne, plantar's warts, or crooked teeth. As though sin merely about personal victory or defeat. We seldom see sin as a brokenness that's bone deep and creation wide, and which ruptures (everything in our lives). Mark then goes on to describe a Bible teacher that he once heard scolding Christians for ministering to barflies. The argument was that even if the sinner was won to Christ, the Christian had lost his pristine testimony.
I believed him then. I no longer do. The question Christ would have us ask is not, "How will this or that act affect my witness?" His question is "What can I do to HAVE effective witness?" There is a vast and fundamental difference between those two questions. Thanks Pastor Mark for reminding us that our walk with Christ is a walk away from boring "borderland", and straight into the risky ethics of God's "holy wild".
May I highly recommend this book to you. Go buy it; you won't regret it. Labels: faith, works |
posted by Alan @ 4:23 PM   |
|
|
|
|
| About Me |
|

Name: Alan
Home: Canada
About Me:
See my complete profile
|
| Previous Post |
|
| Archives |
|
| Sites I Recommend |
|
|
| Books I'm Reading |
|
|
| Powered by |
 |
|